https://www.ifo.de/en/node/68343
This effect is also evident after a regime change within a country. “Following a regime change from a dictatorship to a democracy, government health spending increases by about 15 to 20 percent. In the opposite case, healthcare spending falls significantly,” Dorn says. The change in public health spending becomes evident within a short period of time after a regime change. This correlation is not evident in the case of private healthcare spending by the general public.
“Democracies not only invest more, they also have higher-quality healthcare. Promoting democratic structures and institutions appears to be a key element in strengthening the resilience of health systems,” Dorn says. He adds that democratic governments are more interested in the health and welfare of their people than dictatorships. As a result, they invest more money in public health infrastructure and are eager to reduce inequalities in access to good health services.
The study was based on data from the World Health Organization (WHO) covering public and private expenditure on healthcare in 151 countries in the period 2000–2015. The dataset used permitted an examination of the effects of political systems on healthcare spending both within countries and between them.
ABOUT IFO INSTITUTE:
“Shaping the Economic Debate”: The ifo Institute wants to help shape the economic policy debate in Germany and Europe. We can do this because we combine excellent research with economic policy relevance. Our research findings provide policymakers and business leaders with a basis for making informed decisions. We prepare economic findings in such a way that the media and the public can understand and classify current economic and political events. The people at the ifo Institute, its supporters, and its committees make it possible to fulfill our mission. Our close cooperation with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) in Munich is an important basis for our success.
Add new comment